How Women Can Dominate The World Through Spiritual Power.

There was a time at the dawn of recorded history when people worshiped the Great Mother. This was a golden age of peace and harmony where women rule the world and men worshiped women as goddesses. But later when people no longer worshiped the Great Mother and worshiped male gods then female power declined and we now live in a world of conflict, wars, poverty and widespread suffering.

So now in our patriarchal world men clearly more powerful than women. Physically, men are on average bigger and stronger than women and mentally more competitive and aggressive than women. This means that in our materialistic world men have all the advantages.

Clearly women will always find it difficult to compete against men for power in our patriarchal world.  Some women are able to teach themselves to be assertive and competitive and be successful in dog-eat-dog world of patriarchal politics and business.  While other women can take advantage of men’s submissive and masochistic desires and dominate men in the Femdom world. But there is another way women can gain power without having to learn how to be assertive or find passive or masochistic men and that is through spiritual power.

Although men have all the advantages in the materialistic world, women have the advantage in the spiritual world. Unfortunately, women are not using this power, because in our patriarchal world with its patriarchal religions this information is not given to women. We all have been taught to worship male gods and women do not know the unlimited power of the ancient Great Mother.

Mystics tell us that God is the ONE, the All-That-There-is, One mind and One Spirit. This means that God cannot be masculine because the masculine is all about aggression, competition, conflict and individualism, all of which brings about separation and therefore cannot create Oneness.  So in no-way a male god can be One mind, One Spirit. This is why the nature of God has to be feminine. Because the nature of the female is about nurturing and maternal love and it is through unconditional and universal love that we can all become ONE in love and harmony.

Therefore because God is the ONE, She is All-powerful, omnipotent and omnipresent. She then becomes the most powerful force in the universe. So when a women is in communication with the ONE she can become in tune with this unlimited power.

Unfortunately, in patriarchal religions women are not taught this. They are instead taught that God is male and so when a spiritual woman attempts to pray to God or meditate, she finds it difficult to contact God because she is praying to a false male god. It is a bit like trying to tune into a radio station but are given the wrong tuning frequency. For this reason we find that only a small number of mystics are able to communicate with God within patriarchal religions.

Patriarchy teaches us that not only God is male he is also judgmental and punitive. For this reason Christian in the past called themselves, “God-fearing people” as they feared god’s wrath and punishment. It is true that Jesus taught that God is a loving Father God but somehow this concept never caught on.  Probably because in a patriarchal world we are taught that love is a weakness. So if we think of a all-powerful masculine god we assume he must have masculine power which is aggression, force and violence.

This is why a true god of love can only be female. We find this in the past in Pre-Christian times love is always represented by a Goddess, like Aphrodite, Venus, Freya and Radha. Unfortunately these goddesses were part of a patriarchal pantheon which always had a creator male God. So people could not find the total Oneness of God through prayers to these goddesses if a male god was the creator.

At the dawn of recorded history we do find ancient Great Mother who gave birth to the world. So in this deity we can find true Oneness because not only is she female, she was the creator of our universe. This means ancient people could see her as the Creator Mother whom like a mortal mother give us, her children, unconditional love.

So if that is true, why would people move away from such a wonderful, uplifting religion like this? It seems that the holy women of the Great Mother made a fatal mistake of allowing male priests into this religion.

According to Robert Graves, male priests where allowed in the priesthood if they were female in their behavior. So these priests wore women’s clothing, had false breasts and even castrated themselves. Probably at first, they only had male priests who were genuinely very feminine in the way they were. But this left the door open for deceitful ambitious men who would see this as an opportunity to gain power for themselves by becoming priests.

So this type of priests would pretend to be feminine but inside will be competitive males and set about competing with the holy women for power. They claimed that it was unfair that they only worshiped a female deity and not a male one as well. Holy women in an effort to be fair gave into this and so the Great Mother had a son. Over time this son became either the lover or brother of the Great Mother and they became joint creators of the world.

Once a male god was introduced he undermined the whole concept of Oneness. In is easy to tune into a sense of Oneness through the unconditional love of Great Mother. But a lot more difficult if a aggressive and competitive male is introduced into people’s prayers and meditations. So people began to lose their connection to the Oneness of the Great Mother in these changing religions.

So as women began to lose their connection to unlimited power of the Great Mother they found themselves at the mercy of men. Over time, male priests began to take control of religions creating powerful male gods and pushing the priestesses into second place. Finally goddesses and priestesses were push out of religions completely and we only had male gods with male priests like we see in Christianity, Islam and Buddhism.  

In more recent times things are changing and female power is beginning to rise again. In the last two hundred years the power that patriarchal religions have over people has been undermined by science and atheism. This is giving women the opportunity to try and recreate the ancient religion of the Great Mother. Unfortunately, knowledge of the theology of the Great Mother has been destroyed but it can be rediscovered through meditation and communication with the Great Mother.

What is difficult for people used to the teachings of patriarchal religions is the idea that the Great Mother loves us all unconditionally and She will give us everything we want and desire. Which people find hard to believe as many of us are not getting what we want or desire. But that is mostly because we now worship false male gods or don’t believe in religion at all.

Unfortunately, because we are given the gift of freewill and because we are brainwashed by patriarchal teachings and attitudes most of us wrongly use our freewill to prevent ourselves getting what we want.
 We are taught by patriarchal teachings that we have to work hard to get what we want or to be ‘good’ for God to give us what we desire.

In spite of the false teachings of patriarchal religions many spiritual people have somehow managed to find a tenuous connection to the Great Mother and been worshiped like gods. Some have created religions through this like Buddha and Mohammad or religious sects some of which ended badly. Well known examples would be Jim Jones which ended up with the massacre at Jonestown. Or David Koresh which led to the Waco siege and more to mass killings. Then finally, Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh who at one time had a large international following but ended up in prison.

In the past these gurus or god-men have blamed their failings on the Devil but nowadays they tend to blame the ego which has become a modern day scapegoat. Patriarchal religions haven’t delivered a better life for us all and many people feel that God has abandoned them. This is summed up in the words of a Bee Gee song called “Wind of Change”.

Don't you understand what I'm sayin',
we need a god down there.
A man to lead us children,
take us from the valley of fear.

Make the lights shine down on us,
show us the road to go.
Help us survive, make us arrive,
teach us what we need to know.

What we don’t realize is that God hasn’t forsaken us, it is we who abandoned God, when we choose to worship false male gods. The whole history of patriarchal religions tell us that men, even with the best intentions, cannot teach us the unlimited wisdom of the Great Mother. Only women can do this providing her teachings hasn’t been contaminated too much by the teachings of patriarchal religions.  

The competitive and aggressive nature of men prevent them from tuning into the unlimited wisdom of the One mind, One spirit. Only women through their maternal love can do this and find the Great Mother within themselves.

This then brings up the question and that is if the Great Mother is all-powerful why did she allow this to happen? After all if God was male we would expect him to actively interfere in our world and the fact that God does not do this, shows us that God is Female. She is totally feminine and so gives us all, her children, unconditional love. So no matter how badly these power-hungry men behaved she still loves them. She has given us all the gift of freewill and so will never actively interfere with the freewill of anyone.

Instead of bowing down and worshiping spiritual minded men we all would be better off if we worshiped spiritual minded women who have contacted the Great Mother through prayer and meditation.

For centuries women have been successful mediums or channels even though their teachings have been contaminated by patriarchal thought. Much of it has been dismissed by patriarchal critics as pollyannaish platitudes as they seem unrealistic optimistic. And example of this is Mary Baker Eddy the founder of Christian Science who believed we don’t need doctors as we could all heal ourselves in the same way as Jesus healed people in the Bible.

The difficultly with Christian Science is that in the 19th century when it started, it had to compromise too much with patriarchal beliefs within Christianity. Mary Baker Eddy push things as far as she dare, by claiming that God was both male and female. These compromises made it difficult for her followers to communicate with the Oneness of the Great Mother and perform miracles.

We have similar teachings in, “A Course In Miracles” channeled by Dr Helen Schueman these are teachings again come from the feminine One and as they were channeled in the 20th century there was less need to compromise with any patriarchal spiritual teachings. Though the true nature of God is not discussed in these teachings.

The best example of Goddess teachings come from the medium Esther Hicks. Unfortunately, although her teachings comes from the ancient Great Mother, her husband claimed they come from Abraham an Old Testament prophet.

This confusion came from a misunderstanding. Her husband Jerry Hicks asked her, while she was channeling, who was speaking through his wife.  She answered they come from the beginning of all religions. Jerry Hicks assumed this must be Abraham because he was the founder of the patriarchal religion of Judaism from which came Christianity and Islam. What he didn’t know was that there were other religions before Judaism and that the foundation of all religions was the ancient religion of the Great Mother.

So he claimed his wife was channeling Abraham even though her teachings was very different to the teaching of Abraham we find in the Bible. But the name stuck, which was a pity as the name does put off anyone interested in Goddess spiritual teachings.

To sum up. Men have all the advantages in a materialistic world because of they are, on average, larger, stronger and more aggressive than women. But women are far more powerful spiritually because the ONE is feminine in nature and therefore women find it much easier to access spiritual power then men.

In the patriarchal age men lost their connection to the unlimited power of the Great Mother because they were tricked into worshiping male gods. Which allowed men to take over and rule the world. So women can regain their power when they stop worshiping male gods and find the ONE the Great Mother, within themselves. 

Gynocentric Christianity

 

Ancient Priestess

We live in a world where boys and men are encouraged to be tough and macho. We can see this in so many Hollywood films where the hero is tough and extremely violent. This is not new thing as we have many stories from history of violent, macho heroes. Who is loved by the most beautiful women in the film.

The big problem with this, is that a world ruled by these macho men is also a world of violence, wars, genocide and chaos. So we have to question whether encouraging young men to be aggressive and violent is a good idea.

The opposite way of seeing men is in the figure of Jesus who has a reputation of being, “meek and mild”. His teaching are an embarrassment to many Christians as he taught people to people to, “turn the other cheek”, to “love your enemies and bless them that hate you”. He even predicted that, “the meek shall inherit the Earth”.

This is the total antitheses of a macho man who would be condemned as a wimp if he behaved like this. It is also not the behaviour of Old Testament heroes like David, Moses or Samson who likewise were violent men. It is even not the behaviour of Mohammed who also used violence against those who opposed him.

Clearly, we would live in a far more loving and caring world if all men behaved like Jesus, but as the Bible shows, when he was betrayed and false allegations made about him he didn’t resist. Then he was whipped and crucified and he was powerless to prevent this happening.

So does this show us that, yes if would be wonderful if all men behaved like Jesus but this is impossible in our brutal, macho world. So if this is true why has this story survived for two thousand years?

Clearly Jesus is the antithesis of the macho man that most patriarchal societies promote, so how it is that his story has survived? The reason seem to be is that his story is so popular among ordinary people. The patriarchal elite may disapprove of the behaviour of Jesus but if the common people like him, then the ruling elite go along with this, if it gains popularity for the Christian Church.

Most patriarchal writings teach us that it is natural for men to be “tough and macho” and that you are not a “real man” unless you behave like this. Yet, if this was true why do patriarchal societies have to indoctrinate men to behave like this?

So could it be that men like Jesus because they see themselves in his behaviour? While women like Jesus because he is the type of men they would like to be with? As many people have pointed out even though Jesus is glorified in the Christian religion, he would be condemn by his own Church if returned in our modern world.

Certainly a male behaving like like Jesus would be bullied at school and in the workplace and be condemned as a wimp or a masochist. Yet there are men who naturally behave in the way Jesus taught.

We can find such men in the homosexual community although there are also very macho gay men. While in the heterosexual community we find femdom men who want to serve and worship women. Men like this are condemned as perverted masochists for wanting to do this.

Yet femdom desires can teach a man to be loving and caring for women and other people. But such men are clearly not macho and this is why patriarchy prefers to call such men masochistic, rather than loving men. Unfortunately because of patriarchal pressure, some femdom men feel they need to assert themselves to try and prove they are ‘normal’.

Of course in the Bible we don’t find Jesus wanting to serve and worship women. On the contrary, it is claimed he did sacrificed himself to appease a angry male god and this is why Jesus is popular in the homosexual community. For a male to sacrifice himself to another male is something they like.

In the heterosexual community it would make more sense for Jesus to sacrifice himself to a Goddess and this it seems is suggested in the Gnostic Gospel, “The Sophia Of Jesus Christ”. Sophia is the ancient Jewish Goddess of wisdom.

Jesus is not the only sacrificial/saviour god there were others before Jesus and these religion were very popular. So popular that before Roman imposed Christianity onto the Roman Empire, the three most popular religions were, the Egyptian Isis religion, the Mithras religion and Christianity all had sacrificial/saviour gods within them.

So why would the whole concept of a loving sacrificial male god be so popular? It could be that this is what men are really like, but it is only patriarchal indoctrination that turns them into brutal macho men.

The very passive and masochistic behaviour of men is shown to us by the military. Where the army can easy train men to become so obedient that in WW1 millions of soldiers walk out of trenches to face certain death from machine-gun fire, because they were ordered to do so. The Japanese air force took it a stage further when they used suicide bombers in WW2.

In fact the whole patriarchal society is dependant on men’s blind obedience to those in authority over them. Unfortunately, the whole of patriarchal history shows that patriarchal rules care little for the people they rule as they exploit them.

It would make far more sense if our world was ruled instead by caring women. This I think is what the creators of all sacrificial/saviour religions tried to promote. Unfortunately, all were destroyed and distorted by patriarchal rulers so only Christianity now survives but censored and changed to the degree that patriarchy could tolerate it. 

Goddess of Love

 God is female and not male. Mystics tell us that God is One, one mind, one spirit. Oneness comes through unconditional love and we find this in the maternal love of females for children, though some women can extend this to everyone else. So Universal love has to be feminine in nature.

So it is a waste of time worshipping a male god because the masculine is about, individualism and separation which leads to loneliness, fear, conflict, violence, hatred and chaos.

So all of us lost our contract with God when we started to worship male gods because we were on the wrong wavelength in prayer or mediation. The feminine God loves us all unconditionally which is the message Jesus was attempting teach us. But in the Bible this message had to work in the confines of a loving father god which didn’t work very well.

Our history is a history of conflict, violence and hatred because it is dominated by the masculine with male rulers and religions of male gods. We can reverse this when we worship the feminine, which is what femdom men are attempting to do. (Even though they might get it wrong when, ‘topping from the bottom’.)

We live in a world dominated by patriarchy and it seems that the masculine way is all-powerful. Yet the true power of the universe is the All-powerful feminine One. We are at the mercy of masculine power when we lose our contract with the Feminine One. So a Goddess religion based on Omnipresent and Omnipotent Female One is the way we can regain our power and create a loving and caring world.

So the instincts of Femdom men might be right, even though their desires might be distorted by patriarchal indoctrination. Women are also indoctrinated by patriarchy to believe they are weak and naturally submissive. But some women have somehow followed their own instincts and questioned patriarchal dogma.

It is through such women that we had women working together to empower themselves. So that during the 19^th and 20^th centuries we have had Feminism and the Suffragettes who have given women greater political and economic power.

Some these women have understood that God is female, like Emmeline Pankhurst who once said. “trust in God SHE will provide”. And it is from this understanding that they become powerful. 

To read more about this go to. Female Friendly Femdom 

Matriarchy

A Femdom Religion?

The teaching of Jesus was about tolerance, peace and love.  Yet Christianity itself has a reputation of bigotry, intolerance, force, violence and even hatred.  His teachings like; "Turn the other cheek", "love your enemies" and "resist not evil" as well as his behaviour in allowing himself to be betrayed, whipped and crucified doesn't fit in with the behaviour of the Christian church.  His teachings seemed to be masochistic. 

To quote the King James Bible.

In Matthew chapter 5 verse 38

Ye have heard that it hath been said.  And eye for a eye a tooth for a tooth:

But I say unto you.  That ye resist not evil: but whosoever she smite thee on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.

And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloak also.

And whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, go with him twain.

Give to him that asketh thee, and from him that would borrow of thee and not turn not thou away.

Ye have heard that it hath been said.  Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy.

But I say unto you.  Love your enemies, bless them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you:

That ye many be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth the rain on the just and on the unjust.

We can see the same ideas in Luke chapter 6 verse 27

But I say unto you which hear, Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you.

Bless them that curse you and pray for them which despitefully use you.

And unto him that smiteth thee on the one cheek offer also the other; and him that taketh away thy cloak forbid not to take away thy coat also.

Give to every man that asketh of thee; and of him that taketh away thy goods ask them not again

And as ye would that man should do to you, do also to them likewise

For if ye love them which love you, what thanks have ye for sinners also, love those that love them.

And if ye do good to them which do good to you, what thank have ye? For sinners also do even the same.

And if ye lend to them of whom you hope to receive, what thank ye? For sinners also lend to sinners, to receive much gain.

But love ye your enemies, and do good, and lend hoping for nothing again; and your reward shall be great, and ye shall be the children of the highest:  For he is kind unto the unthankful and to the evil.

Be ye therefore merciful, as your Father is merciful.

Judge not and ye shall not be judged:  condemn not and ye shall not be condemned:  forgive, and ye shall be forgiven.  

Many Christians do not like these teaching and prefer to ignore them but Jesus not only taught this, he also practiced it.  Jesus allowed himself to betrayed by his disciple Judas, even though he knew what Judas was doing.  He didn’t try to defend himself from accusations made by the Pharisees, either.  He also didn’t cooperate with Pilate’s attempts to get him released. 

In the end, he voluntary allowed himself to be mocked and beaten and then whipped, tortured and crucified by the Roman soldiers.  So why was Jesus behaving in this way?  After all, he comes across as a total wimp, because he never attempted to stand up for himself.  You could even accuse him of masochism.  For this reason many Christians do not like the extreme "meek and mild" image that Jesus presents to the world.

Scholars, points out that the story of Jesus is not original or unique because many other pagan gods like Osiris, Orpheus, Dionysus, Bacchus, Mithras, Odin, Bader, Loki and Pan also had similar histories.  The story of a god-man who performed miracles like healing the sick, then was condemned to death and crucified, but returned from the dead, was commonplace in many pre-Christian religions.  These gods died on trees or stakes and some like Dionysus and Jesus died on crosses. 

Most of these stories come from Mystery Plays but unfortunately much of the knowledge of these plays were destroyed by Christians and Moslems.  So today we don't know a lot about what the Mysteries were, but if we look at the behaviour Jesus and other sacrificial Gods we can get an idea of what they might be about.

What Christians claim is that Jesus in the Bible sacrificed himself to the Father God for the sin of mankind.  They also claim that God was angry with mankind and Jesus sacrificed himself to appease the anger of his father.  This is, in spite of the fact that Jesus claimed that the Father God was a loving God.  In other sacrificial gods all the sins of mankind are accepted by the saviour god who then is abused, punished and put to death.  So he becomes the scapegoat for the sins of the community.

Now in all Mystery religions there is an outer and inner mystery, where all knowledge of the inner mysteries is unknown except of an initiated few.  In the earlier Mystery plays the saviour god sacrificed themselves to The Great Mother.  For instance, in the Nordic mythology, Loki, one of their oldest Gods, was sacrificed to the Goddess Skadi.  While even in the Jesus story, his crucifixion is witnessed by the three Marys.  Who probably represented in earlier times the Triple Goddesses.

Jesus is also called a king and this may be about a very ancient tradition where the king is sacrifice.  It seems in the matriarchal past only queens could rule but she had consort kings.  These were mostly young men, and if the queen grew tired of him then he was sacrificed for the fertility of the land. 

Why this happened might be because a deposed king may be angry at his lost of power and status and stir up trouble for the Queen.  Or he might be executed because he began to abuse his power, and tried to undermine or disobey the Queen.  So the sacrifice of kings had a long tradition until with the rise of patriarchy, kings became too powerful to allow themselves to be sacrificed.

For this reason, the tradition of the sacrificing the king may have happened as matriarchy was declining.  In a true matriarchal society men would not expect to have any power, and so a Queen could have many lovers with no fear that these men will want to take away her powers.  As it would have been unthinkable in those days, that a male could, depose a queen and rule in her place. 

But with the rise of patriarchy, then queens may find themselves with lovers with strong political ambitions.  So the only way to deal with them, was to have them executed, or threaten them with execution and claim it was a sacrifice.

This type of sacrifice probably wasn't voluntary, but in the savoir god tradition it was.  It was made very clear in the Bible that Jesus made no attempt to resist being crucified.  So from this we have to ask the question how can the voluntary sacrifice of the god-man to the Great Mother, save us all? 

In the past there was once a peaceful and caring matriarchal age that worshipped the Great Mother.  In this age women ruled society and men never questioned this rule.  Then women began to allow men more freedom but this went too far and men abused this freedom, and ended up taking over and ruling society through violence.  Clearly if we look at the history of the last four or five thousand years we can see clearly that men have made a terrible job at ruling the world.  Men's answer to all problems has been aggression and violence, .which has created a world of wars, genocide, poverty, fear, hatred and suffering. 

This was clearly seen two to three thousand years ago at the time of the saviour gods when there was still knowledge of the ancient matriarchal past.  At that time there must have been a large number of people who wanted the world to return to matriarchy and the worship of the Great Mother.  But what was preventing this, was violent and aggressive men.

This means that people who attempted to set up a matriarchal society of love and harmony, would be quickly conquered by violent men, who were only interested in loot and enslaving the population.  So it would be clear that the cause of all the wars, violence, poverty and suffering was these selfish and violent men. 

We know from history that the Amazons did for a while attempt to fight fire with fire and fight back.  But this clearly wasn't the answer because by becoming violent yourself you become exactly like the people you are fighting against.  In other words the only way Amazons could be free was to become as aggressive, ruthless and violence as the men they fought.  The Amazons failed to stop the rising tide of patriarchy, probably because women were unable to become as brutal and ruthless as men.

For this reason some women decided on a different strategy and attempted to reform these violent men. To do this they gave them a vision of what a caring and loving world would be like and explaining to them this is only possible if you are willing to sacrifice yourself to the Great Mother. So a story was created about a drama of heroic sacrifice, of a God-man sacrificing himself for the good of the world. To some degree this seems to of been successful because all over Europe and the Middle East there were saviour god religions.  So it seems many men were willing to sacrifice themselves to the Goddess in these Mystery religions. 

The reason might be that if men are the natural submissive sex then men would flock to a religion like this as it would allow them to express their deeper urges to worship women. Unfortunately, these religions became victims of their own success, because the violent men who had no interested in sacrificing themselves, saw these religions as a threat to their power and set about destroying them.

It is of interest that early Christianity was very popular among the slaves of the Roman empire.  This would make sense as many matriarchal societies where victims of the conquering Romans, so there would be a tradition of the worship of the Mother Goddess among the slaves.  For this reason they would be very sympathetic to a saviour god religion like early Christianity. 

Attempts by the Roman ruling elite to stamp out these saviour god religions, was at first was unsuccessful.  It seems that both Christianity and the Egyptian religion of the Goddess Isis and her saviour god Osiris were very popular among the common people and even the troops of the Roman Empire. 

The ruling elite meanwhile attempted to promote a religion based on the sun god, and another saviour god Mithras, but this didn't receive enough support from the people.  So in the end they decided that if you can't beat them join them. 

The Roman rulers simply hijacked the Christian religion and changed it to make it acceptable to them.  They then set about destroying the religion of Isis and Christian sects like the Egyptian Gnostics that refused follow the type of Christianity put forward by the Roman elite.  The actual teachings of Jesus like, "loving your neighbour", "turning the other cheek" was quickly ignored as the Roman rulers and became more interested in the religion of Judaism and promoted this, rather than what was taught by the early Christian Church. 

The promotion of Judaism was the opposite to what many early Gnostic Christians taught, as they referred to the Jewish Jehovah god as the Demiurge and claimed he was a evil god whom Jesus came to save humankind from.  The original Christian teachings was suppose to be an attack on the Old Testament and the patriarchal religion of Judaism, but this was soon changed to endorsing it.

Another big change was that many of the saviour god religions promoted sexual freedom.  We can see this is the religions of Dionysus and Bacchus where many of the famous Roman orgies were Bacchus festivals.  Sexual freedom at the time benefited wealthy women.  This was because if women had a sexual licence to have sex with whoever they liked, then no one could say for sure whom were the fathers of their children and so, men had little idea who were their sons. 

This meant that inheritance of wealth and power could only come down the female line.  Meaning that, a large amount of wealth and power stayed in the hands of women.  It seems that early Christianity was also an orgiastic religion of free love, before it became a state religion.  To promote the power of men, Christianity was changed to have strict marriage laws where it became a sin to have sex outside of marriage.  The idea being that rich and powerful men knew whom their sons were and could pass their wealth and power down the male line, preventing it getting into the hands of women.

Then Christianity as a state religion and later the Moslems set about destroying all knowledge of the ancient religion of the Great Mother.  With this knowledge finally forgotten by the common people, they were then able to put forward the idea that Jesus sacrificed himself to an angry god to appease him.  Rather then the idea that all men need to sacrifice themselves to the Great Mother, and to women, before we can have a peaceful matriarchal world once again.

Perhaps the mystery religions of the past were a few thousand years before their time.  They were trying to promote a vision of a peaceful and loving world in a very violent age.  Today in the 21st century we see in the West at least a different attitude to violent men.  It is far less acceptable for Western rulers to go out and conquer other countries, (though it still goes on, as we saw in the recent Iraq and Afghanistan wars).  And it is far less acceptable for them to rule through fear and intimation.  Western rulers today are forced to listen to the needs and desires of the common people and even respect the views and opinions of minorities. 

So perhaps the sacrificial/saviour god image within Christianity acted as a Trojan Horse for the patriarchal age.  On the collective unconscious level it created an archetype that has influenced all men in Christian countries for the last two thousand years.  So that the idea of voluntary sacrifice has become acceptable to men which is starting to bear fruit in the last hundred years.  It is interesting that feminism has progressed in Christian countries where men allow women to demand equal rights.  This is in stark contrast in Islam countries where feminist women are beaten up, put into jail, and murdered by being stoned and beheaded.

In contrast, we have seen in Christian countries Jesus like men, in Hippies of the 1960s where men have tried to practise peace and love.  Or ideas of the "new man" where men stay at home to look after the house and family while his wife goes out to work.  In its more extreme form, we have the concept of Femdom where women totally dominate men.  So are these men very much in tune with the archetypal sacrificial/saviour god?  Clearly if all men are strongly influenced by this powerful archetypal it will save the world from violence, wars and suffering.

Although Christianity has mostly ignored the teachings of Jesus and have concentrated more on the Old Testament god of judgement and fear, the symbols of a sacrificial Jesus are seen in all Churches.  Also, the Great Mother is represented in Roman Catholic Churches in the disguise of the Virgin Mary.  So even though many Christian priests have only paid lip-service to the teachings of Jesus and the drama of his betrayal and crucifixion, this is still taught.  These symbols, dramas and teachings have been unconsciously influencing men in Christian Counties ever since Christianity became a state religion.

So although in the short term the attempt by matriarchal women to create a submissive saviour god in the past seems like a failure.  The popularity of the sacrificial drama of Jesus Christ has brought about an archetypal change in men, which will allow men to surrender themselves to women and bring about a new matriarchal age.  After all, it is in Christian countries where we see the rise in feminism during the 20th century and more recently the beginnings of Female Domination.  The concept of the sacrificial god, does seem to be working on minds of men to allow themselves to tune into this powerful archetype.

If you want to read more about this go to my other blog. Femdom Christainity

 BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bible – King James version

The Jesus Mysteries – Timothy Freke and Peter Gandy

Jesus and the Goddess – Timothy Freke and Peter Gandy

The Woman's Encyclopedia of Myths and Secrets – Barbara G. Walker

When God Was a Woman – Merlin Stone

The Christ Conspiracy – Acharya S.

The White Goddess – Robert Graves

The Golden Bough – Sir James Frazer.

The Great Mother – Erich Neumann

An Introduction to Matrairchy

Female Supremacy Now

Women Need To Rule Our World

My youtube Video

FEMDOM AND BRAINWASHING

THE EMPEROR’S NEW CLOTHES

Before Feminism and Femdom it was always assumed by everyone that men were the natural dominant sex and this belief still persists today.  But is it true?  It might be like the Hans Christian Andersen story of The Emperor's New Clothes, where everyone said the Emperor wore fine clothing, but the truth was, he was naked.

It is of interest that Femdom was started and created by men.  A man wrote the first true Femdom book, Venus In Furs, which was published in 1870, and up until recently it has been mostly men who have written on the subject.  It also has been men who have paid Dominatrixes to whip and humiliate them. 

Men have encouraged, paid and even demanded that women dominate, use and abuse them to such a degree that women have accused these men of ‘topping from the bottom’.  This is because it seems that men have been ‘calling the shots’ in Femdom and not women.  So why has it been men and not women who have been the driving force in Femdom?   

We must remember that men are brainwashed from childhood to believe men are the dominant sex.  So a man who submits to a woman is called a wimp and would be ridiculed for being so timid.  So what drives these men to defy the whole of patriarchal society and conditioning and publically tell the world they want to submit to women?

This is similar behaviour observed in male lemurs in zoos.  The wild lemurs of Madagascar live in matriarchal groups where the females dominate.  So the females would learn from their mothers how to continue the matriarchy.  But sometimes in zoos this connection is broken where lemurs are brought up in isolation and do not have any role models when growing up.  This means they have to rely on their basic instincts to know how to behave.

What is interesting is that the instinct of lemur males to submit to females is far stronger than the female’s instinct to be in charge.  So there have been cases where males and females have been put in the same cage together and the males immediately submit to the females, using submissive calls and body language.  But the females didn’t always respond to this.  Like in Femdom the male lemurs have to persuade and reassure the females that they are genuine, in wanting to be submissive to them.

Perhaps it might be that men are the true natural submissive sex. It could be that slavery is part of men’s DNA, because slavery has been commonplace throughout recorded history.  Serfs and slaves are totally powerless people, they are actually owned by other people and they have no rights and can be beaten or murdered with impunity.  While the fruits of their labour goes to their owner and not to them.

If men are the dominant sex, why have we had slavery and serfdom?  We have had slavery from the time of the Ancient Greeks and Romans up until the 19th century.  So men cannot be very domineering, if it is so easy for other men to turn them into slaves and serfs?

We also find the same situation in the military, where soldiers are seen as being tough macho men.  Yet soldier will obey without question, the most insane orders which will result in their deaths.  The extremes of this are World War One where soldiers climbed out of their trenches to face near certain death by machine gun fire because they were ordered to do so.  Or in World War Two where Japanese Kamikaze suicide pilots deliberately crashed their aircraft into enemy shipping because they were also obeying orders.  Patriarchy will spin this as iron discipline, but it is also extreme submission to authority.

The surprising thing is that the military can train men to kill themselves when ordered to do so, without any intense brainwashing.  All they do is boss them around on a parade ground and they get so used to obeying orders that they will obey the most insane orders on the battle field.

What is striking about all patriarchal societies is that that they are all based on a hierarchal structure, where it seems men cannot work together unless they appoint a leader to tell everyone else what to do.  These leaders then get total obedience from other men, to the degree it is very easy for all patriarchal leaders to abuse their power.

This is why in all male dominated societies there is a vast gap between rich and poor because the ruling elite find it too easy to exploit the people they rule.  This is only possible because men have within them a very strong instinct to obey orders from anyone in a leadership position.  We have had in the past kings and dictators who have been obviously insane and yet still retain power.  So strong is men’s instinct to obey a leader.

Another thing that is commonplace in all patriarchal societies is the oppression of women.  Where men are encouraged to use their greater size and strength to dominate and abuse women.  So why is it so important for patriarchal societies to keep women

subjugated?

And extreme case is Muslim countries where they have a custom where a man is ‘dishonoured’ if his will does not obey and respect him.  And they only way he can regain his ‘honour’ is to kill his wife.  So if men are so dominant why do they need such an extreme doctrine to oppress women?  If men were the natural dominant sex they wouldn’t need such brutal custom to ensure they were.  Women would instinctively obey men, if male domination was the natural order.  The fact that they have to be forced to obey through extreme violence, makes this questionable.

We use to have a similar idea in Western countries where a man wasn’t a ‘real man’, if his wife bossed him about.  So up until the 20th century wife beating was normal in all Western cultures.  Suggesting there was a lot of disobedient wives who could only be kept in line through intimidation and violence.

So why do all patriarchal countries keep women down?  It might be because if women are not actively oppressed, then they might quickly take over and overthrow the patriarchal ruling class.  Men have a strong instinct to obey anyone in authority so if women take over the leadership position and men obey them.  Then the patriarchal rulers of our world will lose all their power, influence and wealth. We are starting to see this happen with the rise of both Feminism and Femdom in Western countries.

This suggests that the only thing stopping women becoming the dominant sex is patriarchal propaganda and brainwashing.  Even today with the rise of feminism, many men still do not wish to admit in public that his wife might be the boss in their relationship, for fear of ridicule. 

They may even still have problems in private and fight against their submissive Femdom desires as they fear that his wife wouldn’t respect him.  This is because women have also have been brainwashed into believing men are the dominant sex.  We can see this when the Femdom movement started and many women were very suspicious of Femdom men.  Only because they believed that something was wrong with them as they didn’t seem to be like ‘normal’ men.

So perhaps the reason why women cannot dominate men is for the simple reason that they don’t believe they can do it.  Like female lemurs in zoos they have to be persuaded by the males that they truly want to submit to them.  This is why a strong Femdom movement is so important to persuade women that it is natural for men to be submissive.

Women are not encouraged to boss men around and instead are told they must use ‘feminine wiles’ to manipulate men.  Yet, there are women who find it easy to order men around, so what is their secret?  Is it because, they didn’t use feminine wiles but directly told men what to do?  Women are encouraged to be ‘nice’ and ask men to do what they want, but is this really the best way to get what you want from men?  It seems that many men will respond more positively, to the woman giving them orders.

This means we have to look to both sexes being brainwashed by patriarchal indoctrination.  Where women don’t use their power to dominate men simply because they don’t believe they have this power, or are too frighten to use it.  Certainly, if a woman can start to get a man to obey orders, the more she bosses him about the more obedient he will become, because after a while, following orders will become an automatic response.

THE INDIRECT APPROACH

Many women will find the direct approach difficult to do or perhaps have tried it only to find it hasn’t worked for them.  Certainly a woman has to be very confident to boss men around.  There are also men who have been totally brainwashed by patriarchy that men are the dominant sex, that it might be hard to overcome this.

But there are other methods that are not so blatantly obvious.  Like a Behaviourist Psychological trick of associating two stimulus together.  (This came from the Pavlov's dog experiments).  The idea is that if two stimuli are mixed together in a person’s mind, activating one of them will rouse the other.

Women can use men’s sexual desire to help her in this.  When a couple first meet, it is obvious the man will desperately want to get into bed with the woman.  Because of this he is willing at first to accept any type of behaviour from the woman he wouldn’t normally agree to.  So she can be very bossy with him from the start and get away with it, because he only has sex on his mind. This then will associate in his head a bossy woman with sexual desires and may even awaken within him Femdom feelings.  Also getting him use to obeying orders from a woman can quickly become a habit.

This can even work in an establish couple where when the woman sees that the man has strong sexual desires for her, she can be bossy with him. He is less likely to question this then as he has other things on his mind. And again the result will be he will in time associate his wife being bossy with sex desire.  Once this has become a habit she can then start to be bossy, without him wanting sex with her.

Some women may feel they cannot directly give orders to men, but there is a NLP technique that may help.  The idea is to feed orders within normal day to day speech. 

So a woman can say, “dinner is ready, EAT IT NOW, before it gets cold.”

Or she can say, “Can you, GO TO THE SUPERMARKET, to pick up a few things.”

The order part of the sentence is at first just slipped in unnoticed, but over time if the  phrases are used often, it can become more and more empathised until the order is more clearly heard.

The man will then have obeyed her orders without being aware she gave him an order.  To do this a woman has to look at all her speech patterns and see where she can feed orders within them.  Then when the man gets use to this and she can slowly be more direct and obvious in giving him orders.  As the result, she can become more and more bossy without him being aware of the gradual changes in their relationship.

CONVINCING A MAN HE IS SUBMISSIVE

If men are dominant because they have been brainwashed to believe it is natural for men to be dominant.  How do you overcome the brainwashing? 

Indoctrination is very effective if everyone believes in it, this is because all and sundry talks about it to everybody else and so supports and reinforces it in each other.  The indoctrination will also be passed down the generations as parents teach it to their children.  As the result, even if a man has submissive desires towards women, he will fight against it because he believes that there is something wrong with him.  This is because he seems to be different from other men.  Not knowing that other men might have the same secret desires.  

It’s not for nothing that rich people call the common people ‘sheepies’ because most people want to fit in and be seen as ‘normal’.  So the only way men can express their secret desires would be to find like minded people.  This then is the advantage of having a fairly large Femdom community and finding people who feel the same way.

When we had only a small number of men who would admit to their Femdom desires, then most people wouldn’t want to be part of this small group of perverts.  But as the group becomes larger, then Femdom has become more acceptable to more people.  So the perception that many men do have Femdom fantasies is helpful in getting men to own up to their Femdom desires, as people like to be part of a crowd.

It is also be very important to women, because if they find there is a lot of men with Femdom desires, then they will feel that perhaps these men are not abnormal after all.  Certainly women do have the attitude of thinking, ‘what’s the catch’ when dealing with Femdom men and have to have a lot of reassurance to know it’s all right.

It is important to put across the idea that if a man is submissive to women, or has Femdom desires, there is nothing psychology wrong with him.  Certainly pointing out slavery and serfdom in the past and the way military makes men obey orders without question, is helpful in demonstrating that patriarchal propaganda is very dubious. 

Even, books like, 50 Shades Of Grey can be helpful.  It is true it is a book about female submission but it has brought the whole idea of BDSM into the mainstream and making it more acceptable.  So if people can accept maledom they can also accept Femdom.  

Certainly the internet is greatly helpful in this.  Men can go on porn sites and although most of the porn they will see, is basically maledom porn, they will also find Femdom porn on most of these sites as well.  So they can look at this and see if they likes it.  It is well known in the BDSM community that people do switch, so people who can start off in maledom can easy switch to Femdom later on.

HYPNOTISING A MAN

Hypnotism is seen as a powerful tool in gaining control over people, but how do you do it?  The theory is that the mind has two parts the conscious and unconscious mind.  In normal conversation the conscious mind accesses and judges everything told to it and if it is told anything it disagrees with, it will refuse to accept it.  In contrast the unconscious mind accepts everything told to it without question.  So if you want to brainwash a person, then you have to find ways to by-pass the conscious mind.  This can be done in two ways.

Some hypnotists hold up a swinging pendulum and ask their subject to focus on it.  So while the conscious mind is busy watching the swinging pendulum the hypnotist talks to the person.  And then can feed ideas directly into the unconscious mind idea that the conscious mind is not blocking, as it is too busy watching the pendulum.

The second method is simply to make the conscious mind relax.  The hypnotists ask the subject to lie down and relax, making suggestions to reinforce this.  Then when the conscious mind is completely relaxed then the hypnotists can feed suggestions that will by-pass the conscious mind.  This is why TV adverts are so effective in brainwashing people to buy products they don’t need or want.  People became too relaxed watching TV and consciously don’t question the misinformation coming from adverts.

So how can a woman use this information?  Women can easy hypnotist men without them being aware of it.  Many women complain that men don’t listen to what they say.  It can get even worse; some business women at board meetings will put forward an idea but get no response.  Then she will be shocked and outraged when a man later on puts forward her idea and no-one will be aware that it was her idea first. 

It seems this has happened so often, that it has become a well-known phenomenon.  So is this just bad manners or is their another reason for this?  When the businesswoman point out what had just happened, the men in the room deny it completely.  So the only time she will get any support is if another woman is in the room.  So what is going on?

Psychologists have noticed that if a very attractive woman says anything to men.  The men are so interested in watching her, that they don’t hear what she says.  It is a bit like the hypnotist swinging a pendulum to keep the conscious mind occupied.  So, she is hypnotising them without being aware of it.  Because everything she says, will by-passes their conscious mind and goes straight to the unconscious mind.  But having put him into a trance, it is important she knows how to exploit this, for her own gains.

This suggests that an attractive woman, with say a low cut dress or any revealing clothing, with a man is gawking at her, can say what she likes to him, without him being consciously aware of what she is saying.  So she is then in a unique position to be able to brainwash him into anything she likes.  It may even be possible to say outrageous things like, “you will obey me at all times,” without him being consciously aware of it.  Though perhaps most women will try saying things that are less direct at first, to see how he responds first.

If a woman feels too shy or frighten to be so direct with him she can feed what she wants into the conversation.  So she can talk about something like dog training and explain about how important it is to get a dog to obey.  So in this conversation she can put in phrases like, “I expect total obedience”, when talking about a dog.  But if fed to the unconscious mind without censorship from the conscious mind, then the man has in his mind that he has to be obedient to her.

Though this phenomenon can work against women who are not aware of what is happening.  The problem for many women is that if they have a partner who is not consciously listening to her, she could unwittingly brainwash him is ways that she doesn’t want.  If she complains to him, about his faults as this could make them worse.  This means she has to think about what she says and tell him things about what she wants from him, and not what she doesn’t want.

For example, just saying, “you never listen to a word I say.”

I might be true, but it will brainwash him into becoming even more deaf to what she says.

She would be better to say things like, “you always do as you are told.”

Even if it isn’t true, because although he is not consciously listening, his unconscious mind will have heard it and feed it back later to his conscious mind.  And the more she say things like this, the more it will indoctrinate him into what she wants him to be.

I will discuss this more in the NAGGING section of this article.  Also for further research you can buy hypnotism or NLP books or and research it on the internet.  An example of this, is this video on Youtube.

https://youtu.be/-RjoaNR4pjE

WORSHIP

What is interesting is that nearly all patriarchal religions insist on worship, where people are expected to worship a god.  The Muslims take it to the extreme, (like they always do) and strict Muslims are expected to worship Mecca twice a day.  In the past people were even expected to worship kings and emperors. So what is it about worship that is so important?

So it is of interest that we find worship in Femdom where men want to kiss women’s feet, or even their bottoms.  What is so important about worship is the emotions it creates within the worshipper.  When a man worships a woman he feels a strong emotion of devotion.  So it then becomes a powerful tool for a woman to gain total control and dominance over him.  For this reason Dominant Women need to learn from patriarchal religions and get their submissive partner to worship them once or twice a day.

The problem with Femdom is that spanking, torturing or humiliating a man is more dramatic than just kissing a woman’s feet or bottom and so it can be neglected.  But the feeling of devotion that worship brings is also very important.

But can it be used on men not into Femdom?  Perhaps it can at the beginning of a relationship. We all know that at the beginning of any relationship between men and women the main focus for men is having sex with the woman.  So many men have seduction techniques like complimenting a woman and telling her what she wants to hear.  So a woman can play along with his and use it to her advantage by saying things like.

“Am I beautiful,” and the man will off course agree. 

Then she can ask, “do I look like a goddess.”

And again he will agree.

So she can then suggest, “I like being told I’m a goddess.”

The man can then take the hint and tells her she is a goddess. 

She can then respond by saying, “Oh I like that, tell me again.”

So she can get him to tell her she is a goddess a number of times and she can show him she likes it and encourage him to put a bit of feeling in what he says.

Then she can suggest, “Oh, I love to be a goddess and have men at my feet worshipping me.”

Some men may respond to this and worship her, others won’t.  Some might fear that she is trying to make a fool of him, and so she has to reassure him that she is not.

So she can say, “it’s just a fantasy of mine, to be worshipped like a goddess, I would like you to do it, as it turns me on.”

Many men will do this because they might fear that if they don’t, she won’t want to have sex with him.

So there will be two factors working here.  The first one is that, as previously mentioned, that when men stare at an attractive woman the conscious mind gets turned off.  So her suggestions that she is a goddess will go straight to his unconscious mind.  But the very fact of going on his knees to worship her can created feelings of devotion to her.

This can even work with a married couple.  After awhile the sex-drive goes down and people don’t have sex so often.  The woman can then just wait until her husband wants to have sex, and says she is not in the mood.  But then suggest what might turn her on, is to be worshipped like a goddess.  So if she can get him to do that, she can make it part of the foreplay every time they have sex.  And while he is worshipping her she can feed other ideas into his unconscious mind like, “I am she who has to be obeyed,” and pretend it’s a joke if he mentions it.

So again this is another way women can use sex to brainwash men by associating sex with female dominance.

NAGGING

Nagging is something women have done for thousands of years and has something of a bad reputation.  Many women complain they have nagged and nagged their husbands for years and it never changed their behaviour.  But perhaps the reason for this is that it is being used wrongly.

Advertisers and propagandists have noticed that if you repeat the same message again and again, people will end up believing what you say, as the truth.  This is exactly what women do when they nag, so why isn’t it effective for many women?

The reason why nagging doesn’t work is because women start to nag men when they are doing something they don’t want them to do.  So if say a woman tells a man repeatedly, “you never wipe you feet when you come in doors,” she might be unwittingly programming him into never wiping his feet!

So for nagging to be effective it has to be about repeating a message that she wants him to do and not what she doesn’t want him doing.  Therefore, she has to tell him when he is doing the right thing for her.  For example if she wants him to do the   washing up after dinner.  She can perhaps get him to do it once or twice but then she can reinforce this by keep on reminding him, he did the washing up for her.  So by this constant repetition, she can brainwash him into thinking of it, as his job.  

This can be taken a step further if she can get him to obey her at times.  Therefore she can remind him and praise him on how obedient he is.  The more she tells him he is obedient, the more he is likely to accept this and believe it. 

It would be fair to say many women do this anyway, and know how to nag in positive ways.  Positive nagging will become even more effective is a husband doesn’t always listen to his wife so whatever she says will go straight to his unconscious mind without the conscious mind interfering.

BEHAVIOURIST PSYCHOLOGY

Behaviourists believe that they can change any human behaviour and make no distinction between human and animal training.  Some authors claim you can train men like dogs and for people who have had experience in dog training, this is probably true.

So how does it work?  Just through rewards and punishment.  So the principles of Behaviourism are really very simple but what makes it complicated is the people or animals you are trying to train.  This is because what exactly are rewards and punishment are not always obvious.

An example of this is when parents have to deal with a naughty extravert child, where punishment doesn’t seem to work.  The reason might be that the child being an extravert enjoys all the attention and drama associated with the punishment.  So the only way to punish a child like this, would be to ignore it.

The same thing can happen in a Femdom relationship where the man has persuaded the woman to spank him when he misbehaved.  But then finds his behaviour is even worse.  The reason being is that the man enjoys being spanked and so does everything he can to get her, to spank him more.  This then means the spanking is not a punishment but a reward.

B. F. Skinner one of the founders of Behaviourism claims that rewards are far more effective than punishment.  This will suit most women, as they are more able to give rewards to men than trying to punish them.  It is totally impracticable for women to punish men through violence, unless the man actively cooperates with the woman to do this.

Training men using Behaviourism requires keen observation and awareness.  So that when a man is doing what the woman wants, he is rewarded.  This is what Behaviourists call reinforcement.

This means that if a man is say doing the housework or waiting on a woman hand and foot.  She needs to show her appreciation for doing this, so that this behaviour is always reinforced.  This means Behaviourism is not about big dramatic gestures but just small things like a smile, a few words of praise and good timing.  So, that the reward is always associated with good behaviour. Timing can be important as the reward is far more effective if it is instant, rather than something later, when the memory has faded.

So behaviourism is not about being obviously dominant but more for women who wants to get her own way, without shouting orders at a man.

ORGASM DENIAL AS A MEANS OF DOMINATION

One of the strange things that has come from Femdom is orgasm denial, where a woman can go as far as putting a chastity belt on a man.  Then go and have sex as many men as she likes but deny him any sexual pleasure.

The weird thing about all this is that Femdom is suppose to be a sexual kink for men but we are finding Femdom men who are being denied sex completely.  So what is this all about?  We see a similar concept in ancient religions like Taoism in China and Tantra in India where men do have sex with women but are not allowed to orgasm.

This is a big issue because for most men being able to ejaculate inside a woman is what sex is all about, even though they may not care what orifice it is in.  This is why so many men do not like condoms as the sperm doesn’t stay inside the woman.  So to have sex with a woman without orgasm seems like asking too much.

Sex denial for women is commonplace in so many patriarchal societies.  In Western countries in the 19th century if was actually believed that women could not orgasm.  Or if she did, she was some sort of freak.  This was because the way men were encouraged to have sex with women, made it difficult for them to enjoy it.  The reason was that it was over too quickly and the clitoris wasn’t stimulated.

Things didn’t improve much in the 20th century when the female sexuality was accepted, as women had to fake orgasms because men’s techniques hadn’t improved much.  Women even today complain about Internet porn where porn actresses still fake orgasms, and this still perpetuates patriarchal myths about sex.

The Muslims, have taken this to the extreme and cut off the clitoris of girls to ensure women cannot enjoy sex.  So why do this? Why does patriarchy want to deny women sexual pleasure?  We might find an answer from our animal past.

We know many male animals like bulls, stags, rams, seals, lions and gorillas fight each other for dominance and access to females.  So the dominant male gets to have a harem of females with whom he fertilizers, while other males, whom are not big and strong enough, miss out.  

We see something similar in animals like wolves and meerkats that live in packs or gangs, where only the dominant couple are allowed to breed.  (The meerkat is interesting because like most members of the mongoose family they live in matriarchal groups ruled by the dominant female.)

So we see with many types of animals, sex is strongly associated with dominance and submission where only dominant animals enjoy sex.  Surprisingly, this seems to be true of humans as well.  Like many other animals, it seem that the individuals who are allowed to freely enjoy sex however they like, are mostly dominant, while those who are denied sex pleasure tend to be submissive.  So is this the reason patriarchal societies do their best to deny women sexual pleasure?  Because the denial of orgiastic sex helps keep them submissive.

Femdom men talk about ‘sub-space’ where they feel very submissive towards a Dominant Woman.  So perhaps being denied sexual pleasure by her, helps make a man feel very submissive.  Also some women have noticed that some men with Femdom desires are very submissive before sex but not afterwards.  So keeping them in denial is one way to ensure this doesn’t happen.

Now, some people will deny Taoism and Tantra has anything to do with Femdom.  This is because both religions claim that the reason why men are denied sexual orgasm is because sex weakens their spiritual energy.  But they probably had to invent some spurious reason like this, for them to survive in the patriarchal age.  

This is because Taoist and Tantra sex give women all the advantages.  They have sex with the women on top.  She can go as long as she likes with no fear it coming to an end, because he won’t ejaculate.  Also it means he will always be, ‘on the boil’, because not having an orgasm, he will be ready for sex whenever she wants it. 

Also to be able to make a man have penetrative sex without him being allowed to ejaculate, is strong indication of the degree she is able to dominate him. So it’s no wonder both religions had to invent other reasons besides female domination, to deny men having an orgasm, if they were to survive in patriarchal societies.

Women today can use and exploit the teaching of these two religions if they want to dominate their partner and are into Eastern spirituality.  They can tell the man about all the stuff about sex weakening spiritual energy and suggest they try out Taoist or Tantra sex.  Apparently women are allowed sexual orgasm in these two religions, so she hasn’t got to deny herself.  She can then use it to control her partner’s sexuality.  While the fact she is enjoying sex and he isn’t, means that this will provoke submissive feelings within him.

BRAINWASHING AND THE INDIVIDUAL

One big problem is creating a how to do manual is that every individual is different.  For instance some men can be trained by ‘hard to get’ games.  That is the say, the woman shows she is never satisfied and man has to work hard to please her.  This may work for some men but not all of them.  For another type of man if the woman is too hard to please, he will quickly become disheartened and give up.  So what works with one man, doesn’t necessary work for another.

This means a woman might need to experiment with a man.  Some men respond to being shouted at, while others hate it and sulk.  There are men who want to be spanked and humiliated by the woman but others don’t like it and just want to be obedient without the kinky stuff.

There will be men who want dominant women to be cruel and sadistic to turn them on.  But others are just happy to serve a woman without the need the need of any duress.  It is possible for a woman to be dominant without being cruel and nasty, but not all people agree with this.  The trouble is that no two people are the same.

Many women have problems with men coming to them with a list of demands on how they want to be dominated.  These women feel that if they give into these demands there is an issue about who exactly is in charge.  But just because the relationship starts off with the woman dancing to the man’s tune, it doesn’t mean it has to remain like that.

So even though a relationship might start off as a male Femdom fantasy, the woman still has the right to demand changes after awhile, so she gets what she wants.  After all she can point out that having acted out his fantasies, it is time he acted out hers.  This means the relationship can change and evolve and go beyond fantasy into her dominating him in reality.

Although the vast majority of men are submissive and will follow orders from anyone in authority without question there are a small minority of men who are not like this.  These are alpha men and they find it easy to gain power.  Examples of this are men like - Napoleon Bonaparte, Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Benito Mussolini, Mao Zedong and Pol Pot.

It is remarkable how a small handful of men have been able to rule millions or billions of people throughout the patriarchal age.  But they can only remain in power while obedient men follow patriarchal doctrine and suppress women.  Feminists and Femdom men are questioning patriarchal indoctrination and are slowly destroying it. When this happens it will be possible for women to take over the position alpha males and dominate men and rule the world.